Summary: | OpenVPN N2N - After import the Client Package file the warning “Expired” appears | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | IPFire | Reporter: | iptom <tomphz> |
Component: | --- | Assignee: | Peter Müller <peter.mueller> |
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | Aesthetic Issue | ||
Priority: | - Unknown - | CC: | adolf.belka, michael.tremer, peter.mueller, ummeegge |
Version: | 2 | ||
Hardware: | unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
See Also: | https://bugzilla.ipfire.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11742 | ||
Attachments: |
The warning “Expired” appears
No reaction after clicking “Show file” |
Description
iptom
2023-03-21 16:31:16 UTC
Created attachment 1142 [details]
The warning “Expired” appears
Created attachment 1143 [details]
No reaction after clicking “Show file”
Specific components should only be selected for IPFire 3.x There is also an already existing bug id for this --> https://bugzilla.ipfire.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13035 . Best, Erik (In reply to Erik Kapfer from comment #4) > There is also an already existing bug id for this --> > https://bugzilla.ipfire.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13035 . > > Best, > > Erik That bug is unrelated to this bug. This bug is about n2n certificates being flagged up as expired when they are not linked to a patch that was only merged into CU174 Testing. Bug13035 is about a person having problems with making a connection WITHOUT 2FA in CU172. The 2FA was released into CU169. I have not had any problems with existing or new connections without any 2FA since the 2FA code was introduced. So that bug has nothing to do with the expired flagging of certificates. (In reply to Adolf Belka from comment #5) > (In reply to Erik Kapfer from comment #4) > > There is also an already existing bug id for this --> > > https://bugzilla.ipfire.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13035 . > > > > Best, > > > > Erik > > That bug is unrelated to this bug. > > This bug is about n2n certificates being flagged up as expired when they are > not linked to a patch that was only merged into CU174 Testing. > > Bug13035 is about a person having problems with making a connection WITHOUT > 2FA in CU172. > The 2FA was released into CU169. > > I have not had any problems with existing or new connections without any 2FA > since the 2FA code was introduced. > > So that bug has nothing to do with the expired flagging of certificates. Sorry this was the wrong link, meant this one --> https://bugzilla.ipfire.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11742 . This looks good to me. |