Summary: | zone configuration / hostapd: Combining WLAN if with free LAN if into a common "Blue" bridge fails | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | IPFire | Reporter: | Manfred Knick <Manfred.Knick> |
Component: | --- | Assignee: | Assigned to nobody - feel free to grab it and work on it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | - Unknown - | ||
Priority: | - Unknown - | CC: | michael.tremer |
Version: | 2 | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux |
Description
Manfred Knick
2021-04-02 15:24:56 UTC
Hello, I have no idea what the bug is that is being reported here. You can put as many wireless or non-wireless interfaces into one bridge as you like. Nothing is stopping you. (In reply to Michael Tremer from comment #2) > I have no idea what the bug is that is being reported here. You did read the links? > You can put as many wireless or non-wireless interfaces into one bridge as > you like. Nothing is stopping you. The information provided clearly describes that with *my* HW, this does *not* work. Fortunately, by upgrading to Core Update 156, this was resolved - although nothing in the Release Notes gave hope to this progress. Looking forward to testing newly released Core Update 157. Will report ... (In reply to Manfred Knick from comment #3) > Looking forward to testing newly released Core Update 157. . . . WORKSFORME = with configuration previously set, .................... no errors occur on reboot into 157, .................... W-LAN -> Blue works, To be continued: .................... LAN -> Blue remains to be tested, .................... Zone (re-) Configuration has to be tested. Glad it works for you now I intended to close my bug myself,
but *after* finishing my offer:
> To be continued:
> .................... LAN -> Blue remains to be tested,
> .................... Zone (re-) Configuration has to be tested.
Perhaps this is considered as not important.
Strange: NOTABUG instead of "RESOLVED ?
(In reply to Manfred Knick from comment #6) > I intended to close my bug myself, > but *after* finishing my offer: There is a workflow for bugs and what the different states mean: > https://wiki.ipfire.org/devel/bugzilla/workflow However, you said that there is no longer a bug for you which is why I closed it. I do not understand what else is unresolved here. > Perhaps this is considered as not important. > > Strange: NOTABUG instead of "RESOLVED ? Since there is no change to do, there is no bug. The bug would be marked as RESOLVED after a solution has been released which is not the case here. |